Cohort-wide insight across every subject, teacher, and student, built from the marking your teachers already do, not another system to maintain.




Trusted by schools across Singapore
ren suggests marks and feedback; your teachers review, edit, and sign off. Nothing reaches a student without a teacher behind it.
Your corpus, scripts, and calibration sit behind per-school access controls and are hosted in Singapore — never shared across schools or reused beyond your engagement.
ren works from the scanned scripts your teachers already mark and plugs into the classroom platforms you already run.
Class sets marked in minutes, with feedback in their own voice.
One consistent standard across every marker, visible at moderation.
Cohort trends the moment papers are marked, not at the end of term.
An institution-wide picture built from real student work.
Feedback while the work is still fresh enough to act on.
See what a rollout looks like for your school.
Every mark your teachers make feeds one live picture: where the cohort moved, which skills held it back, and which classes need attention — the moment marking finishes, not weeks later at the department meeting.
No. ren proposes marks and feedback; teachers review, edit, and sign off on everything. It removes the mechanical hours of marking, not the professional judgment — and it learns that judgment from your teachers' own corrections.
All of them. Our humanities automarking is the most mature — calibrated to your department's rubrics for structured and extended-response questions. Our STEM companion extends the same marking to every other subject.
Today we run across English, General Paper, the humanities (econs, history, geography), the sciences (physics, biology, chemistry), math, and mother tongue.
ren. is customised per syllabus — O-Level, A-Level, IB, PSLE — and then calibrated to each school's own pedagogy.
Both go together. ren. doesn't mark to a generic standard — it layers in your school's own past papers, answer schemes, model answers and marking frameworks, then learns each teacher's style from the edits they make.
Every engagement starts with a benchmark report: we mark a sample of scripts your teachers have already graded and show you exactly how closely ren. matches them.
In structured subjects we've reached up to a 98.4% match with human markers, and the more your teachers correct, the closer the marks and comments track their voice and your department's standards.
Your school's data is separated by access controls in the application. Accounts belong to your school and requests are scoped to it, so your corpus, your students' work and your teachers' calibration aren't visible to any other school, and are never reused beyond your engagement.
Data is hosted in Singapore and encrypted in transit, and uploaded scripts sit in private storage reachable only through short-lived signed links.
At the end of a pilot or contract, we pledge to delete your data, and we're happy to provide data-handling documentation to support your school's own clearance process.
We start with a free trial. You give us a sample of marked scripts and answer schemes; we return a benchmark report showing accuracy against your own teachers, plus sample feedback.
From there we calibrate and scope a paid pilot.
Start transformation within your school: hello@reneducation.com
Less than a new system usually does. Teachers keep marking from scanned scripts, so there's no change to how students submit work, and no new hardware.
We run onboarding with your department, calibrate to your answer schemes and past marking, and stay hands-on through the first marking cycles.
See the whole picture on your own students. No rip-and-replace, just the marking your teachers already do.